Lansweeper logo
Home Download Features Demo Buy now Help Support forum
 
    Most requested support articles:
  Lansweeper troubleshooting guide.
  The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
  WMI Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED))
  How to configure the windows firewall using group policies.
  Support:  
 support@lansweeper.com  
Skype: Lansweeper  
  Mo-Fri 9h-17h CET  
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

13 Pages«<910111213>
Untag as favorite
What is your top priority feature for the next lansweeper release.
pmich
#151 Posted : Friday, December 02, 2011 9:25:22 AM

Rank: Premium user

Groups: Member, Premium Users
Posts: 1
Location: Komotini, Greece
Hello to all,

since we are new users and we purchased Lansweeper a couple of months ago, we don't if the new feature we propose and is of top priority, has already been asked in the past by someone else.

Our top priority is to have a detailed inventory. We would like to be able to edit and add warranty and purchase dates to each individual component of a pc (motherboard, power supply, processor, hard disk e.t.c.).
If I'm not mistaken, currently, we are able to process these piece of information (warranty dates, custom fields e.t.c.) devices only (PCs, printers, network devices e.t.c.).
But when we upgrade a pc component or buy new Desktop Monitor, the specific component has different warranty period.

Perhaps the easiest way to implement this, is to add an "Edit component details", similar to "Edit device details" that exists in printers, routers, switches etc.

Thank you
Lansweeper
#152 Posted : Friday, December 02, 2011 9:44:26 AM

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Premium Users
Posts: 10,378
pmich wrote:
Our top priority is to have a detailed inventory. We would like to be able to edit and add warranty and purchase dates to each individual component of a pc (motherboard, power supply, processor, hard disk e.t.c.)

We will take this into consideration for our version 5 release.
BullGates
#153 Posted : Wednesday, December 14, 2011 7:47:05 PM

Rank: Premium user

Groups: Member, Premium Users
Posts: 205
Location: PT
We wish to have tracking of the user that modifies the data of "Custom Fields".
Lansweeper
#154 Posted : Thursday, December 15, 2011 3:52:39 PM

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Premium Users
Posts: 10,378
BullGates wrote:
We wish to have tracking of the user that modifies the data of "Custom Fields".

Lansweeper version 5 will introduce role based access to the website. You will be able to configure who can edit information.
pentel
#155 Posted : Friday, December 16, 2011 9:12:12 PM

Rank: Premium user

Groups: Premium Users
Posts: 78
BullGates wrote:
We wish to have tracking of the user that modifies the data of "Custom Fields".


I don't know about version 4, but in 3.5 it is possible to do this programmatically by modifying the source code in the aspx webpages. I'm sure something similar shouldn't be too hard to do in version 4 or 5

I don't remember exactly what I did, but essentially I removed the input for Custom10 so it doesn't get overwritten, and Custom10 gets the name when the "Save" button is pressed then enters it. To get the username you can use HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name assuming there's authentication setup, as opposed to a Request("Custom10") command.
adrzu
#156 Posted : Friday, December 30, 2011 9:32:01 PM

Rank: Premium user

Groups: Member, Premium Users
Posts: 1
Location: Switzerland
1) Search should alsow use wildcards: for example PC name ist "abc-345" and 345 is a unique key, i should be able to find it when i search for it with "345" but i don't.

2) A possibility to compare 2 PCs, to find problems like a wrong Gateway Setting, Driver, etc. (troubleshooting)

3) Up or Down Status, so i see in the list which Devisec are running and which aren't

4) Multiple selection for Devices to run Actions against

5) Hardware Change History

6) Maybe not just a uninstall feature for software but a install feature


Lansweeper
#157 Posted : Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:54:26 AM

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Premium Users
Posts: 10,378
adrzu wrote:
1) Search should alsow use wildcards: for example PC name ist "abc-345" and 345 is a unique key, i should be able to find it when i search for it with "345" but i don't.

The web console search field currently uses a "begins with" filter, not a "contains" filter.

adrzu wrote:
5) Hardware Change History

Hardware changes can be tracked through the "Changes by type" page in the web console or through the report builder (using tables ending in "hist").
bpc
#158 Posted : Friday, January 06, 2012 3:36:45 PM

Rank: Premium user

Groups: Premium Users, Member
Posts: 17
Location: United States
I think I have seen this one mentioned elsewhere in the forums, any update on implementing it?

On the Operating System License Compliance page (default.aspx?item=oslicense), make each listing a hyperlink so you can see the list of computers. I realize this can be done with custom reports, but it sure would be handy to have it right on that page.

bpc attached the following image(s):
2012-01-06 08h33_55.png
Lansweeper
#159 Posted : Friday, January 06, 2012 3:48:22 PM

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Premium Users
Posts: 10,378
bpc wrote:
On the Operating System License Compliance page (default.aspx?item=oslicense), make each listing a hyperlink so you can see the list of computers. I realize this can be done with custom reports, but it sure would be handy to have it right on that page.

This is on our to do list, but we do not yet have a release date for this feature.
maweko
#160 Posted : Thursday, January 26, 2012 8:18:41 AM

Rank: Premium user

Groups: Premium Users, Member
Posts: 1
Location: Lux
Bitlocker Reporting is still not implemented.
Wasn't it announced for vers 4.2 ??
DGoodwin
#161 Posted : Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:23:33 PM

Rank: Premium user

Groups: Premium Users, Member
Posts: 49
Location: NC, USA
maweko,
we are scanning the registry for the value Software\Policies\Microsoft\FVE\ 'RequireActiveDirectoryBackup' and then using this for a report:

Code:

Select Top 1000000 tblComputers.ComputerUnique As Computer, tblComputers.Username As [Last User], tblComputersystem.Model, tblRegistry.Regkey, tblRegistry.Valuename, tblRegistry.Value As Enabled, tblComputers.Lastseen, tblComputers.Computername From tblComputers Inner Join tblRegistry On tblComputers.Computername = tblRegistry.Computername Inner Join tblComputersystem On tblComputers.Computername = tblComputersystem.Computername Where tblRegistry.Valuename = 'RequireActiveDirectoryBackup'


I'd like to have a more accurate way to tell, but it should get you close.
Lansweeper
#162 Posted : Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:30:03 PM

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Premium Users
Posts: 10,378
Custom scanning of files or registry keys is currently still required for BitLocker reporting.
bburnside@rochestergauges.com
#163 Posted : Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:35:58 AM

Rank: Premium user

Groups: Member, Premium Users
Posts: 6
Location: Dallas
A couple of easy ones:
1. remote boot (for Wake-on-Lan machines)
2. Remote registry (saves steps of open regedit, add other computer...)

THX
Bob
THX
Bob
Lansweeper
#164 Posted : Thursday, February 02, 2012 2:15:53 PM

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Premium Users
Posts: 10,378
bburnside@rochestergauges.com wrote:
1. remote boot (for Wake-on-Lan machines)

A Wake-on-LAN option is already available. You need to click on the network card listed on a computer's webpage under Actions\Network Wake On Lan.

bburnside@rochestergauges.com wrote:
2. Remote registry (saves steps of open regedit, add other computer...)

Are you referring to a custom action to open regedit on the target machine? Such an action is not currently implemented, but we will add it to our customer wish list.
bd
#165 Posted : Thursday, February 09, 2012 5:11:02 PM

Rank: Premium user

Groups: Premium Users
Posts: 41
We have 8 scanning servers, one for each division. The local IT manager is responsible for their own local clients. When we want to pull reports it's painful to compile all that data.

It would be nice if there was a way to send scan data from each local division server to a master server to look at the company as a whole. I know this could be done with a double scan (setting up a "master" server in addition to the local server), we did this before, but there were complaints about network traffic.

Kind of an off the wall request, but it would be nice for me :)

Users browsing this topic
Guest
13 Pages«<910111213>
Untag as favorite
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Contact: E-mail Lansweeper - Skype : Lansweeper
Copyright 2004 - 2011 © Hemoco bvba